Which Side Are They On?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Möbius Aromaticity : Which Side Are You on ?
INTRODUCTION The idea of Möbius aromaticity was first proposed by Heilbronner in 1964. He postulated that a molecule could gain Möbius aromatic stabilization if the nuclear framework were twisted so the porbitals composing the π-system would contain an odd number of nodes. To introduce a node in the orbitals, Heilbronner theorized that a series of p-orbitals could itself be twisted by contortin...
متن کاملdietary supplement use in sport gyms in lebanon: are they necessary and are there side-effects?
background the use of dietary supplements is very common in sport gyms worldwide. however, their use in exercisers in lebanese gyms has never been investigated. conclusions these results indicate a lack of awareness among people who exercise regularly on the benefits and side-effects of dietary supplements. there is an urgent need for the implementation of campaigns that target gym users in leb...
متن کاملBayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
Researchers are often confused about what can be inferred from significance tests. One problem occurs when people apply Bayesian intuitions to significance testing-two approaches that must be firmly separated. This article presents some common situations in which the approaches come to different conclusions; you can see where your intuitions initially lie. The situations include multiple testin...
متن کاملWhich side are you on? The ethics of self-command
Thomas Schelling observed that when people use self-command to prevent their future selves from acting waywardly, they eVectively divide themselves into two selves with conXicting desires for the same point. In the morning, for example, a dieter may not want dessert at dinnertime but change his mind when at table. This raises the question of which self is authentic or rational. Or, if we are as...
متن کاملLanguage and thought: Which side are you on, anyway
The debate over language and thought has traditionally been framed by two opposing stances: „universalist‟ and „relativist‟. The universalist view holds that language is shaped by universals of human cognition; on this view, languages make semantic distinctions drawn from a limited palette of universally available options – and when languages do differ semantically, those linguistic differences...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Review of Social History
سال: 1991
ISSN: 0020-8590,1469-512X
DOI: 10.1017/s0020859000110703